Slice of life.
Aug. 4th, 2006 10:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
When beginning to hash out the crudest basics of wedding logistics, a great and harsh truth was revealed to me:
John gets to wear black. And I don't.[1]
Additionally, half of most everything I find on this sort of thing when casually browsing runs along the lines of "Get out of the way of the bride!" "The bride knows what she wants!" "Years of planning and dreaming!" "Beware the wrath of Bridezilla!"[2] and I'm thinking I did not get this memo.
I'm supposed to plan this? I should have a Pavlovian response to white lace and bells? There were meant to be notebooks covered with little hearts from back in grade school? Am I honestly expected to look at wedding dresses and have my first thought not be "That would probably be pretty in black"?
---
[1] Yes, I know I *get to* wear black, shave my head, and do anything short of exchanging ring fingers instead of rings.[3] That's not the point.
[2] I didn't actually see this one, but John swears it exists.
[3] "We are not exchanging ring fingers instead of rings!"
"Oh come on, it's classic splatterpunk--yeah, okay."
John gets to wear black. And I don't.[1]
Additionally, half of most everything I find on this sort of thing when casually browsing runs along the lines of "Get out of the way of the bride!" "The bride knows what she wants!" "Years of planning and dreaming!" "Beware the wrath of Bridezilla!"[2] and I'm thinking I did not get this memo.
I'm supposed to plan this? I should have a Pavlovian response to white lace and bells? There were meant to be notebooks covered with little hearts from back in grade school? Am I honestly expected to look at wedding dresses and have my first thought not be "That would probably be pretty in black"?
---
[1] Yes, I know I *get to* wear black, shave my head, and do anything short of exchanging ring fingers instead of rings.[3] That's not the point.
[2] I didn't actually see this one, but John swears it exists.
[3] "We are not exchanging ring fingers instead of rings!"
"Oh come on, it's classic splatterpunk--yeah, okay."
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:28 am (UTC)I wore royal blue.
White is for people with fake tans. Ew.
Who wants to be one of them?
And... yeah. The whole industry is freakilly bride-centric. Bend them to your Will! (It's technically possible, although it does take a lot of repeating yourself and turning to your beloved, within ear-shot of whoever needs to be bent, and saying things like "What do you think, honey? This being your wedding, and all?" But it *can* be done).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:41 am (UTC)White kind of does appeal (I'm just backing slowly away from how *much* it's meant to appeal, which it doesn't), but in that way that makes me want to break out the sample sheet of whites we used when picking wallpaint. Gold white, cream white, palest grey, lilac white... *shrug*
Maybe trim or something...?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:34 pm (UTC)Also, you might try a reddish amethyst (heavy silk, maybe?) which would be close to burgundy/wine, but would also have a hint of purple to it. :-)
There are a fair number of wedding dresses that combine Massive Amounts of White with a crimson or burgundy, or black trim. So it could be done. :-)
(Keep in mind: White will makes us pastey-skinned folk look dead -- Whether your'e going for the corpse-bride look or not. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 01:59 am (UTC)(Ivory and burgundy sound kind of nice together. Hrm.)
I need to take a deep calm breath on all this.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:46 am (UTC)I figure as long as I remind myself exactly how good a seamstress I'm not, I'll still be safe to look at Threads magazines. (Someone had a wedding dress with a fifty-foot outside-diameter flouce. Hand-tacked and -beaded. Dear *God*.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:40 pm (UTC)(If it's the latter, I can *totally* recommend Tracey Vibert. She did my dress, and she's absolutely amazing -- both as a seamstress and as a person to hang out with! And she'll run you significantly cheaper than buying something will -- although not as cheap as if you do it yourself).
So. :-) What's the plan (if there is one yet. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 01:54 am (UTC)I don't even know what I want, yet. Still have not thrown out the idea of co-ordinating separates rather than a dress.
I am probably not making my dress, as I'm pretty sure I'm not that good. Also, it would be stress central.
I am so glad I'm a temp right now. May is about the time government contract work tends to dry up, so I can probably run around like a beheaded chicken without it affecting my job references.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 11:46 am (UTC)Separates are a good idea. I went with a bodice and skirt, rather than a dress, and then wore the bodice to brunch the next day. (Easier for mixing and matching with other stuff later on. :-)
Re: (Not) Making your dress: Agreed about the stress-central. :-)
And, again: tracey is awesome. ;-) (I will endeavor to shut up about her now). :-)
- TTFN,
- Amazon. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:38 am (UTC)Pretty much.
Th ring finer thing reminds me of the BME couple who but off the ends of each other's left ring finger and kept them as vows.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:42 am (UTC)Ah, splatterpunk. We hardly knew ye.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 06:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 07:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:17 pm (UTC)It occurred to me that one advantage of white, should you chose the right fabric, is that it can easily be dyed afterwards...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 11:19 am (UTC)Frances wears the tux. John wears the dress.
We always said he'd make a *great* cross-dresser. What better time to prove it?
-K
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 02:13 pm (UTC)It just throws her that she *can't*.
Besides, a wedding dress would probably end up covering up his legs--
--I need to go scrub the image of John in a strapless white sheath dress out of my brain now. I'm not sure he could be unattractive, but it still carries a huge element of wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 03:02 pm (UTC)Point is, do what makes you happy. Nothing says you can't do anything, and hell, with the white dress, that's like 200 years of tradition that took a 50 year break, and then a 20 year break. Yeah.
I was thinking I look like ass in white, so I was thinking ivory because it complements my complexion a lot better, but then I thought red looks much more awesom on me, and it is the traditional marriage colour in most oriental countries (India, China, etc.) because it represents luck, and well, that works for me. As for my bridesmaids, they all voted on black, and so they can all wear black in the style of dress of their choice. I believe the flower girl will be wearing white unless she declares a desire to wear another colour.
I guess the moral of the story is "It's your wedding, do what you like, especially if it results in stress reduction."
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 03:43 pm (UTC)(Prom was showing up at an event someone else organized to make the point that I damn well could, and then going off to Zaphod's. I don't want that, not least because John doesn't particularly enjoy Zaph's.)
It's not that I can't do anything; it's that I think some of the things I can do aren't appropriate. (See ring fingers.) Hence why I'm willing to assign weight to the truth behind the statement of my not getting to wear black; in the cultural context I best relate to, find appealing, and want to work in, it's poor form.
Which really kind of annoys me, but okay. This seems like an excellent time to start getting the hang of compromise. {:)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 04:37 pm (UTC)None of this 'doomed-to-the-dress-up-closet' stuff to deal with. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 01:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 11:41 am (UTC)Handy thing about specifically black: Most people can't tell the difference between red-black, blue-black, green-black, etc. Whereas red-purple and blue-purple are different enough to look wierd together. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-05 05:37 pm (UTC)Everyone else was in black; bridesmaids, groomsmen and groom.
Wear whatever your want. Rich and I considered tattoos on ringfingers rather than rings, but that conversation lasted about 5 seconds...
It's really your day, make it reflect who you two are, not who others expect you to be.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 01:49 am (UTC)I think I'll be okay. It's just very odd, since who I am does not tend to involve large gatherings. (His family is *huge*. Me, I'm expecting eight from my side, and at least two of those probably won't make it.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 11:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-08-06 12:01 pm (UTC)Our wedding was similar, except I'm the one with the huge family and Rich's family was about 8-10. It worked out fine though, and yours will too.